I have recently seen a video where a form in a picture frame was hanging on the wall. And there was a figure on the rope in front of it extracted from the form. The concept was "Art taken out of context". When I was ready to leave a comment there I have already lost that exciting Instagram post. So I'll leave my thoughts about it here.
The first thought which comes to my mind is that it is possible to duplicate taking out of context. Take any punching machine and scatter ten products on the floor nearby - and here is the conceptual installation. We make a silicone mold for our master models and further goes the extraction from the context.
In nature the context is a parent with a womb. The art of a creator is not so shallow and flat. It is dragged out in time and is still unattainable, but the essence of copying is clear. However, the issue of the concept is also not so simple. There is a dilemma between the primacy of the concept and numerous copies. First of all it is necessary to create a master model, a genre, style and only afterwards to pull it out of the context, make a label and sell well overlooked new.
In my opinion man can not be an inventor, he can be only a discoverer. It means that for the place where nothing is new under the sun one context for everyone has existed since the beginning of times for all occasions. And every pioneer enthusiastically pointing at the extraction of any form of art is an ordinary lucky guy who managed to notice what others failed to see. A new beast in the wild nature evolution or an unexpected metaphor in relevant space, it may be even a process of extraction of newborn art... not the process itself, but at least a thought that it would be nice to see how inspired emanations materialize into the contexts for further replication.
Some properties of creativity as outer beauty and inner feelings become boring on a number of the circumstances not depending on the individual, leaving a space only for reflection about extraction... out of life experience context.
The first thought which comes to my mind is that it is possible to duplicate taking out of context. Take any punching machine and scatter ten products on the floor nearby - and here is the conceptual installation. We make a silicone mold for our master models and further goes the extraction from the context.In nature the context is a parent with a womb. The art of a creator is not so shallow and flat. It is dragged out in time and is still unattainable, but the essence of copying is clear. However, the issue of the concept is also not so simple. There is a dilemma between the primacy of the concept and numerous copies. First of all it is necessary to create a master model, a genre, style and only afterwards to pull it out of the context, make a label and sell well overlooked new.
In my opinion man can not be an inventor, he can be only a discoverer. It means that for the place where nothing is new under the sun one context for everyone has existed since the beginning of times for all occasions. And every pioneer enthusiastically pointing at the extraction of any form of art is an ordinary lucky guy who managed to notice what others failed to see. A new beast in the wild nature evolution or an unexpected metaphor in relevant space, it may be even a process of extraction of newborn art... not the process itself, but at least a thought that it would be nice to see how inspired emanations materialize into the contexts for further replication.Some properties of creativity as outer beauty and inner feelings become boring on a number of the circumstances not depending on the individual, leaving a space only for reflection about extraction... out of life experience context.



